This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Intelligence Agency, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Intelligence AgencyWikipedia:WikiProject Intelligence AgencyTemplate:WikiProject Intelligence AgencyIntelligence Agency articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
@FortunateSons: I would recommend changing "using a women’s passport" to "using a false passport". Sources say it was a false passport with a bogus identity; not the passport of an existing woman. Polygnotus (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That’s a good point; according to Tablet, it’s a women’s passport, and as confidentals says it’s a false passport, I would suggest changing it into “using a forged women’s passport”. What do you think? FortunateSons (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps "as a female, using a bogus identity"? I am no expert in this area. I will ping @WhatamIdoing: who knows more about this kinda stuff than me. My gut says that any passport she owns is automatically a woman's passport (but my gut is not trustworthy and I do not respect the English language). The idea is that it was a fake identity of someone who does not exist. Polygnotus (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FortunateSons: I have no judgement, and if I did I would not trust it. I mostly focus my energy on being cute, not on being right. Polygnotus (talk) 12:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also quite valid pursuits if you ask me. If you prefer: I like your suggestion FortunateSons (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that the gender on the passport is relevant. What matters is that it was forged. I would just shorten it to "forged passport". WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That seems reasonable, thank you :) FortunateSons (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, thank you. The easiest solutions are often the best. Polygnotus (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This wikipedia article seems to rely heavily on a few articles that summarize Frank's memoirs. Are there any other sources that confirm her story? (Or perhaps I missed the part in the articles that includes some verification of her claims?) Rainsage (talk) 05:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is indeed an issue. Some claims (like her work for Israeli intelligence) is independently verified, and some are plausible based on statements or observations of journalists, most notably and not yet included this written by him. This is unfortunately the nature of stories about lower level intelligence people, they can be notable and yet not notable enough for an official government enquiry or to have their cover publicly blown, which are often the two only ways to get fully uncorrelated coverage. FortunateSons (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
where were her claims of working for mossad independently verified? i tried googling but couldn't find anything. Rainsage (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the lobster article is another source that relies heavily on her memoirs and does not independently verify her story. also, lobster seems to be a niche journal about conspiracy theories, based on the wikipedia article about it. Rainsage (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lobster (magazine) is definitely a complicated source for a case like this, having both actual investigative content and more conspiratorial stories. However, there are multiple contributions that can be cited reasonably safely IMO, particularly in cases where the writer is a subject-matter expert or journalist, which the latter is here. Do you disagree? FortunateSons (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lobster mostly just summarizes the claims made in her books, so I don't personally think it counts towards establishing the "verifiability" of the claims made in this wikipedia article. It also uses sensationalist, tabloid-like language.
Most of her books are out of print and were published by a company I can't find any info on. Rainsage (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My first request at RSN didn't get any feedback, I will try for a second one just in case. FortunateSons (talk) 07:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if Misaskim is a reliable source. All they actually claimed to confirm was that she worked for Mossad and was Jewish. Rainsage (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that’s the nature of operational information. We have RS coverage with generally plausible claims and about as much secondary information as we can get without one of the affected countries opening their archives. If they do and it doesn’t match what she claimed, I’m happy to revisit it in the future. FortunateSons (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but then it doesn't really count as "verifiable"? Rainsage (talk) 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, that is the nature of much of what military and intelligence does. Her identity and work is verifiable, there is appropriate RS coverage, and the details will rely on either aboutself or open archives. Some of the claims are appropriately plausible, for example, per the author:
The Third Direction includes on pages 207 and 337 scanned images of two Security Service letters, including the image of a government envelope addressed to "Mr & Mrs J Frank". Both letters to Mr and Mrs Frank are signed by "T. Denham for the Director General" of MI5. The The Third Direction also includes on page 399 the text of a key email sent to the banker Elizabeth Forsyth by one of the Asil Nadir trial barristers. The accuracy of Olivia Frank's account of her encounters with Elizabeth Forsyth in prisons at Holloway and Cookham Wood was confirmed by Mrs Forsyth in personal interviews and emails, published at https://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/lob79-mossad-john-le-carre.pdfFortunateSons (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i mean, i think that this wikipedia article should be more like the JC article which consistently makes clear where it is just repeating claims that she made in her memoirs. The "Alleged work for British intelligence and later life" section already does this... Rainsage (talk) 01:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which phrasing do you feel is less clear than it should be? FortunateSons (talk) 06:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
