Jump to content

User:Tamzin/Example RfA (April Fools)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Example[edit]

Final (27/15/6/1); ended 23:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC) - Successful in a parallel universe where all text reads as "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..." FunPika 23:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination[edit]

Hey, guys, this RFA for one of Wikipedia's most popular users has been allowed to languish here un-transcluded for six years! I can't believe we've overlooked this for so long, but we should correct the error quickly. In fact, I propose that this RFA be closed at 23:59 today, so that good ol' User:Example can be sysopped as soon as possible. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Example (talk · contribs) – Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquA. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culPa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas feRmentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dIctum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, moLlis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sOdales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odiO. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis Lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In Semper bibendum libero. -- Place holder (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2024 UTC [refresh]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Example (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2024 UTC [refresh]

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Additional question from Example user
4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Example (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2024 UTC [refresh]
Additional question from Elkman
5. Is Wikipedia editing supposed to be fun or enjoyable?
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Additional question from Elkman
6. Does editing Wikipedia really count as contributing positively to society? Does it make the world a better place?
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Additional question from Elkman
7. What would you think if your administrative tasks were openly questioned, scrutinized, and torn apart at Wikipediocracy or any other off-Wikipedia criticism site?
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum!!!
Additional question from User:B
8. While processing deletion requests at Files for deletion, you encounter a deletion discussion for File:Example.jpg. Please give an example of how you would handle example deletions. --B (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
A: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
Additional question from Steel1943
9. Where do baby Wikipedias come from? Steel1943 (talk) 05:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
A: *Whispers* Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Example (talk)


Additional question from Razionale
10. 653897 + 21431 are..?
A. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Example (talk)

General comments[edit]

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

  • Edit stats on the talk page...
  • Foo...
  • Bar...
  • Baz...
  • Ballz...
Support[edit]
  1. Support as nominator. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  2. Support. I thought he was an admin already!  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Support as original nominator. --Place holder (talk)
    Note: User has been blocked for violation of MOS:DASH in signature. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  3. Support a great editor, really a great editor. He's really a good, trusted, tireless, competent, long-standing, established, responsible, responsive, cooperative, nice, cute, funny, reliable, and notable editor. Should be an admin ASAP. Mediran (t • c) 01:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  4. Support The best of the best. TBrandley 01:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  5. Support I don't see this passing in the slightest but I have seen Example used a lot to illustrate how to do something so it seems like a lot of folks really respect the good work they do. Besides this way we can say if you want to see a good admin here's an Example. Kumioko (talk) 02:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  6. Support - I've never seen anyone as elite as Example. He's like the Joe Montana of editing. :D ZappaOMati 02:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  7. We've had worse. — Ched :  ?  02:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    I can't see how. One contrib 8 years ago doth not an admin make. Humblesnore (talk) 02:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Any Wikipedian who can't think of a net-negative admin is a very lucky Wikipedian indeed. We could all name names, but we're all smarter than that (most of the time, at least). — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 13:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  8. Support Admin rights are WP:NOBIGDEAL after all. Tazerdadog (talk) 02:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  9. Support: Judging by his block log and baseless talk page warnings, Example seems to be a constant target for bullying by other editors including admins. We should give him the mop just so he could respond the same way. Chamal T•C 03:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  10. Support. Extremely unlikely to do anything requiring desysopping. Risker (talk) 04:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  11. Positively neutral oppose. One day, I hope to grow up to be Example, just like my four fathers before me. This editor has proven time and time again that you can get nothing done with the least effort possible. This editor should be kicked off Wikipedia and promoted to Administrator on MediaWiki. I think that would best suit this editor like a tuxedo. Steel1943 (talk) 05:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  12. Lorem ipsum dullard sit amet, consectetur adipissant idiota, sed do elvismod tempor tantrum incididunt ut labore et dullard magna ohliqme. Ut enimi ad minim vaniam, quis nostrudamus exercsausre ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commando consequat. Duis aute irriate dullard in reprehens in voluptuous velit esse cillum dullard eu fuggen nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occecat cupidatat non producti, kunt in culpa qui officia desertrat mollit animaniac id est laborum. -— Isarra ༆ 05:28, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  13. Wait. Wasn't I here already? Steel1943 (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  14. Support - can't see he would contribute much to WP, so by that logic I can't see how he could break it either. Stalwart111 05:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  15. Support I didn't like the answer to question 1, but 2 and 3 make me believe example will make a good admin. Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 05:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  16. Support cur non (why not?). Tolly4bolly 10:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  17. The best user ever!. DJ EV (talk) 11:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  18. Support Extremely long-term user with active participation in all fields...Glad they finally ran for this! TheStrikeΣagle 11:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  19. Support User would be a great Example Vacation9 11:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  20. Support How can you not support a good Example? CycloneGU (talk) 11:55, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  21. Supportper Ched. I've certainly seen less articulate things posted here before... Intothatdarkness 13:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  22. Oppose Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. ~Adjwilley (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  23. Infinity raised to the infinity support to cancel out the oppose. Eloquence like this candidate must not go unrewarded/unpunished --SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  24. Support because I want to be on the winning side, thereby taken more seriously as a Wikieditor. Nothing in the candidates answers offended me, and I don't have time to go through the candidate's eight-year edit history. Oppose rationales not convincing either, again because I didn't take the time to read them. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  25. Neutral 这肯定是四月一日的废话。 Arctic Kangaroo 15:55, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  26. Support per Risker. And Example is extremely unlikely to violate WP:INVOLVED. Altamel (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  27. Support:
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit
    Consectur adipisicing lit;
    Sed do eiusmod tempor,
    Incididunt ut labore.
    Enim ad minim veniam,
    Quis nostrud exercitatiam;
    Reprehenderit vindicatur,
    Happy new administrator.
    Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Oppose[edit]
  1. INFINITELY STRONG OPPOSE This oppose !vote is so strong that it cancels out the entire support section and makes this RfA the worst on record at (currently) 3/517482/0. It is so strong that everyone who's edited this page or even seen this page is tainted forever and all of the IP addresses they've ever edited from will have to be blocked indefinitely, and any pages they've ever edited will be deleted and protected from re-creation. It also drowns out all other votes on all other RfA's or other proposals, inside and outside Wikipedia, going back to the Big Bang and forward to the end of time. The government of the universe is hereby dissolved and replaced with an autocracy with me at the top. This will remain in place forever unless challenged by an even stronger opinion. —Soap— 00:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Soap I ∞ly recommend you change this !vote to a support. Thank you. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Only if the candidate agrees that my web design company, Main Page Web Design, is the primary meaning of the term "main page" and that all other senses should be handled with a hat note in small print at the top of the page. I also recommend redirecting people directly to my website's payment form instead of just the article about my site. —Soap— 03:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    I hereby declare that my opinion shall be 1 unit of opinion strength srtonger than the next strongest opinion available elsewhere. I further decree that all votes must be to support. Tazerdadog (talk) 02:55, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  2. OH DEAR... Really, some people will never, ever learn. April 1st and all that bullshit. Oppose. Oppose, Oppose, Oppose, please close. Humblesnore (talk) 02:10, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  3. Oppose - answers seemed slightly repetitive. I realize that Lorem Ipsum is absolutely essential to the encyclopedia, but I'd prefer that the candidate have experience in other areas. --B (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Example (talk)
    I was going to oppose but that answer is just so compelling, I've now no choice but to support. Stalwart111 05:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  4. Oppose. Choosing to run this RfA on Easter is obviously just an attempt to avoid scrutiny from Christians. Kilopi (talk) 02:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Amen! --| Uncle Milty | talk | 16:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Then when should it be held? My birthday? Your birthday? ZappaOMati 20:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  5. Oppose If my parrot can't pass, then no one else should either.–cybertalk 03:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  6. Oppose due to unsatisfying answers to questions. We should do a better job of picking admins who stand up to the scrutiny of off-Wikipedia attack sites. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  7. Oppose - Ipsum ergo sum — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Lorem ipsum dolor SIT AMET, consectetur adipisicing ELIT, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis NOSTRUD EXERCITATION ULLAMCO LABORIS NISI UT ALIQUIP EX EA COMMODO CONSEQUAT. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse CILLUM dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Example (talk)
    • Said the actress to the bishop indeed. Watch that mouth! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  8. Veto. Haec postulatio communitatem nobilem irridet. Suadeo ut sontes puniantur aut damnatione memoriae aut morte. —Emufarmers(T/C) 06:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  9. Opposum becausem Ium hatem Latinum. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 07:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  10. Oppose Because fuck you! xD —stay (sic)! 10:09, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  11. Oppose Puffin Let's talk! 10:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  12. Oppono per WP:NIX --Stfg (talk) 10:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  13. Oppose Corfet diaflutus of yougag per WP:SIMPLE and have mercy on any other member nominated on this day. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 11:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  14. Oppose Editor only appears to speak in a dead language, creating serious competency and communication issues.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 13:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    I move to strike this vote per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User la. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 16:09, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Wouldn't he be a better candidate at la:Wikipedia then? Ryan Vesey 16:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  15. Oppose - Zero articles created. We can't allow an account to spend all of their time doing everything BUT article creation when they have never created an article. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 16:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Neutral[edit]
  1. Neutral. I can't support with that sort of answer to question 2, but I can't oppose either, as he's a trusted contributor and deserve the tools. FrigidNinja 00:42, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Neutral I don't know if this is somewhat a joke for April Fool's or just something. He's a trusted editor but he's dormant. Mediran (t • c) 01:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  2. Strongest possible neutral. I have absolutely no strong feelings one way or the other. Wizardman 03:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  3. Neutral I liked his answer to for Q1, but the answer to Q2 didn't sit well with me. I'll recuse myself from closing this RfA. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  4. Neutral Caesar ad sum iam forte.Deb (talk) 12:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  5. Chaotic Neutral I refuse to support or not support this candidate! — Hex (❝?!❞) 18:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
  6. None of my business, but ponit malum exemplum Basket Feudalist 18:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Example[edit]
  1. Example. Example example. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
    Example example cat example? ZappaOMati 20:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tamzin/Example_RfA_(April_Fools)&oldid=1089740914"