Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 11

< July 10	July 12 >

July 11, 2006[edit]

Template:Infobox CityIT2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 02:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unused template, its features are already part of Infobox CityIT, which is the template to use for Italian cities and towns. Angelo 23:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox CityIT3[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 02:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unused template, its features are already part of Infobox CityIT, which is the template to use for Italian cities and towns. Angelo 23:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Italy town[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 02:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unused template, its features are already part of Infobox CityIT, which is the template to use for Italian cities and towns. Angelo 23:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:User sdlBasic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was move to user space Pagra shtak 02:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Used by one person, links to an article which doesnt exist (consider moving to user namespace?). Matthew Fenton (contribs) 23:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move user space per WP:GUS —Mi ra 21:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
GUSIFY-- Drini 02:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:PFCS Awards Chron[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete template for pages removed via AFD -- Drini 02:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This template contains links to a various annual awards for a non-notable film critics society. I deleted the pages for the annual awards per this AfD. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Redirect to[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete It breaks bots, makes more difficult to identify pages, and other similar reasons. -- Drini 21:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that just does the same as (and is) #REDIRECT [[Page title]]. Invitatious 15:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is useless. Mário 16:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Useless. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 23:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
rename? seems like it could be a good redirect shortcut if the name was shortened. Something like {{subst:RD|article}}. ---J.S (t|c) 22:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this is much worse than useless, it hides the fact that a page is a redirect, which will break pretty much all bots. --Cyde↔Weys 19:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and uselessness. -- NORTH ^talk 21:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox musician[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 02:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. superseded by Template:Infobox musical artist. CG 15:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:AU-SR[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 02:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All Images in Template up for deletion, Made Obsolete by New Template & Images in Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:AU-SR - Boochan 06:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Infobox Town NH[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 02:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I realize there was discussion about this six months ago, but it seems to me the (new and improved) Template_talk:Infobox_City has everything we need. At this time there are only 36 towns that use the template. What reason(s) is/are there to keep it? --SatyrTN 04:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Put in holding cell and then DELETE. Template:Infobox City is much better. —MJCdetroit 00:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Infobox City has become the standard. --harpchad 15:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.