This page is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This page is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Streetcars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Streetcars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StreetcarsWikipedia:WikiProject StreetcarsTemplate:WikiProject StreetcarsStreetcars articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
It is now deleted, but some of the rolling stock articles like R32 (New York City Subway car), R46 (New York City Subway car), R62A (New York City Subway car) and R68A (New York City Subway car) still have links that formerly led to the official route assignment list and roster. Should we remove them? It is highly unlikely his website will return following his death and even if it does, the lists will be outdated as some models have been retired, new ones have taken their place, and route assignments change frequently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.230.20.116 (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My fault for not doing this earlier, but I want to propose merging the B67 and B69 pages. They share around half of their route together, and have interlined frequencies and share a timetable with each other, and considering that other route groups that share this share a page, I was thinking the same could happen for the B67 and B69
Considering that the B67 and B69 are going to be serving both different north and south terminals by next year, you could merge them now, but for the sake of the history of both bus services, it would be best to keep them separated. —LRG5784 (talk·contribs·email) 22:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I personally have a problem with this whole <F> express thing. Unlike the respective <6> and <7> expresses, the <F> express is just simply two trains per day in the peak direction during rush hours. Can I please ask if it's possible to get approval for it to be removed entirely and instead just simply mention in the notes, history and lede section of the F train article? Please? Any thoughts? Just curious. TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 02:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's more of an MTA question than a Wikipedia question. As reduced by comparison as it may be, it still has a separate diamond, physical signage, and rollsigns/LEDS consistent with the <5> and <6>. Cards84664 14:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The <F> doesn't even have its own article, it's pretty much mentioned as you say in the F train article. But it is mentioned because it exists. Not even sure what you're asking to have removed. -- rellmerr(talk page • contribs) 10:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rellmerr, don't get snarky with me first of all. No duh it doesn't even have its own article, but like I said from the beginning, it's just simply two trains a day compared to the <6> and <7> expresses as well as the 5 express in the Bronx. It should only be a note in the F train article. That's all I was asking so save your snarky attitude for someone else. If you have nothing positive to say, then move along. TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't snark, it was an actual question. You didn't make clear what you were asking for, it sounded like you were arguing that the <F> shouldn't have an article, and it doesn't. I literally said I'm not sure what you're asking to be removed. You made this note on the project talk page without context, so it needed clarification. That's it. I don't know what got you so upset, but don't take that out on me.
But this has been discussed already. It is mostly a note on the F article. If your argument is that we shouldn't include it as a route on the infoboxes, firstly you should state that explicitly.
Also, this is Wikipedia. Even had I meant what you assumed, this is a collaborative process. We're supposed to discuss even if we disagree, that's how we reach WP:CONSENSUS on a decision like the one you're (unclearly) asking people to make based on your personal feelings.
But if this were a !vote, I'd weakly oppose removing the <F>. Sure it's only four trips a day, but the Z has only 12 or so. What's the cutoff before we include/exclude? -- rellmerr(talk page • contribs) 20:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rellmerr Yes, my argument this entire time is that we should not include the <F> express on the info boxes because it's only two trains a day. Plain and simple. So please miss me with "my personal feelings". I do not see why was this so misunderstood or dismissed for. You guys need to think. Just only mention it briefly in the lede section and put a note in the station section of the F train article. The Jay Street–MetroTech, 7th Avenue and Church Avenue station articles can just simply say "the two center express tracks are used by two peak direction rush hour F trips" instead. Also, why are you comparing this to the Z? The J and Z skip-stop services are officially advertised in the official subway map, on platforms and on the MTA's official website and app. Whereas the <F> express hardly isn't, so you can't make that comparison. Is this clear enough for you guys or do you guys need another demonstration? Sheesh. TheMasterofAllHitmans (talk) 23:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was doing some research on the M86 bus route and there is no mention of the Gracie Mansion trippers that used to be part of the route. I was looking into old timetable from between 2007 and 2015 that showed the M86 deviating off it's normal route and continuing further to East End Avenue where it would end without any return trips, with return trips being factored in as time went on, either starting at York Avenue/86th Street or at East End Avenue. I could use past editions of the M86 timetable as sources in order to add the information in, which I obtained from the Internet Archive. —LRG5784 (talk·contribs·email) 22:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
