This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There aren't currently any other London Borough categories in there so it's not clear which to follow. The category is definitely using the current London Borough boundaries and thus includes MPs who sat for Shoreditch seats prior to 1965. Timrollpickering 13:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I think this one needs a full discussion. I am not persuaded that it's a good idea to categorise MPs by local govt area ... and if kept, we need to consider various options for how to name it. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 15:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - yuck, yuck. I'm not familiar with the hierarchy, but if the answer is to categorise MPs by London Borough then you're asking the wrong question, or at the very least WP:OVERCATing. Hackney has only been a London Borough for 40-odd years, whereas it has been (one or more) constituencies since the 19th century. In this case "Hackney" is presumably referring to Hackney (UK Parliament constituency) and its successors rather than the borough.Le Deluge (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.