Category talk:Longevity claims
This category was nominated for deletion on 16 November 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Longevity NA‑class | |||||||
|
Ageing and culture NA‑class (inactive) | |||||||
|
Split Proposal[edit]
We could split this category into those claims that were debunked/shown to be false (i.e. George Fruits and those that are neither proven true nor proven untrue. Comments welcome.Ryoung122 03:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Category should also include claims that are verified. --Michael C. Price talk 03:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)