This page is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I noticed that every time I submitted this article for approval, I got the notice that the topic is too soon to be added. However, past elections have added their candidate pages roughly 18 months in advance, which is less than the time it takes until the next election. Additionally, reliable media sources are already talking about current candidates, https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/elections-nomination-conservatives-liberals-ndp-bloc-1.7203859 demonstrating that the matter is topical and worthy to be added as a source.
Whoever is responsible to approve this page, please approve it as the page's topicality is well established. CJJ400 (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everything's cited now, so that issue's taken care of. Hopefully it'll be approved soon. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 20:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that's it's "too soon"; an election could be called at any time since we're in a minority government situation. -- Earl Andrew - talk 14:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nearly 300 candidates nominated by their parties so far. I guess we wait until it passes 500 and try again. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If a snap election is called at some point this fall, then the article can be rapidly moved into place at that time. But until that actually happens, the fact that it's theoretically possible is not a compelling reason why a candidate list would need to already be preemptively in place this far in advance of an election that is officially scheduled for October 2025. And no, it has not been typical for candidate lists to routinely be in place 18 months in advance of federal elections; I'm sure you can find examples of that happening, but it's quite routinely been seen as WP:TOOSOON, and articles created that early have regularly been either deleted or sandboxed, and then restored later on when the time frame before the election was more reasonable.
And further, Wikipedia practices have often evolved over the years, with us being a lot more strict about many things in 2024 than we were in 2004 or 2014, so what we might have done a decade or two ago is not relevant to how things would be done today at all.
There simply is no pressing reason why this article would need to already be in mainspace now. If a snap election does get called before October of next year, then we'll deal with that when we get there — but until a snap election does get called there's no urgent need for a candidate list to be in place any earlier than six months before the officially scheduled election. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}