Talk:2005 Mumbai High fire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion of File:Mumbai High fire.jpg[edit]

Dear @Explicit:

(Premise: I know this is the talk page of an article, while the thing I am discussing here is an image. But since the image has been deleted, I cannot now use the image talk page. I am instead using the talk page of the only article which was using said image.)

Would you care to kindly explain to me why you deleted the File:Mumbai High fire.jpg ? There was a whole rationale about fair use on the file page, the definition of the image was low, the event is an important historical event (no doubt; a full blown disaster in terms of both loss of life and financial impact, perhaps lesser known just because it happened in a developed country), there is no other image freely licensed/in the public domain available (I looked everywhere using all the tools listed in the Wikipedia guidelines), and it greatly enhances the informativity of the article. What I did not do, admittedly, is using the Template:Non-free use rationale 2, instead I put the information in the image description box. I shall now reinstate the image and use said template. If you think it needs be deleted again, kindly tell me where my understanding of the non-free use rationale fails, because just deleting the image would not educate me. Kind regards, JudeFawley (talk) 08:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]