Talk:2021 Tunisian self-coup/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. (t · c) buidhe 17:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 22:26, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By my estimation the article is not close to meeting the GA criteria, particularly when it comes to broadness. The article's background starts in 2020 with the Covid-19 pandemic. While that is important background, scholarly sources analyzing the coup (see the further reading section) emphasize the historical background going further back to the Arab Spring and the democratization of Tunisia. Another aspect nearly missing in this article is the justification and causes for the coup among its perpetrators—explained in Nassif and other scholarly sources. Other aspects covered in sources, such as the limitations of the voting allocation system as a factor in causing the coup, are not even mentioned. There is hardly anything about the legality of the coup despite it being extensively discussed in the scholarly source Tamburini 2022. Information about public opinion can be expanded by Ridge 2022. These papers can be accessed by WP:TWL or WP:RX. (t · c) buidhe 22:26, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.