Talk:Action off James Island

Military history: Maritime / British / European / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Misinformation[edit]

The British vessels in this action were all commercial whalers. Only Rose sailed under a letter of marque. The small size of the vessels' crews relative to their armament is clear evidence that their business was whaling, not privateering, which in any case only Rose was authorized to do. The fact that these vessels were brigs, and carried guns, does not by any stretch of the imagination make them gun-brigs.Acad Ronin (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acad Ronin,This is yet another fantasy article that was created by a wikipedia contributor with an agenda, who was indefinitely banned. In some cases, the article is about an event which happpened, but needs a root and branch rewrite. In a greater number of cases, he has come across skimishes, and wrote fantasy essays about how they were set piece battles. When I did fact checking for Lake Borgne, I was amazed how much of the content he had made up, which bore no resemblance to what was recounted by source material. Keith H99 (talk) 09:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Action off James Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150709083440/http://www.1812privateers.org/Great%20Britain/marque1793-1815.htm to http://www.1812privateers.org/Great%20Britain/marque1793-1815.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]