Talk:Ahmed Khatib

Comments

This article was splitted from Yoni_Jesner_and_Ahmed_Khatib an there is an ongoing discussion in Talk:Yoni_Jesner_and_Ahmed_Khatib#Split. There are some serious concerns over the connection of those seemingly unrelated persons together.

Thanks.

--Maashatra11 (talk) 19:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

• Maas is less than transparent here.

The history is that Maas first, as the article was at DYK queue, nomed it for AfD. He failed to garner consensus support for his AfD. He argued at the AfD for splitting this article. He failed to garner consensus support for that as well.

For good reason. While Maas for some reason argues that the two people are not connected, that of course fails completely to recognize that The Guardian, ABC, The Sunday Times, the Telegraph, the Gulf Times, Dawn, the Church Times, and BBC World Service all focused on the two together. All of this is clear both in the article, and in the failed AfD.

Upon his AfD failing, he now both: a) seeks to split this article (his suggestion that was not accepted at the AfD), and b) starts a non-consensus, POINTy, forum-shopping creation of both of the articles he sought to create by split -- here and here.

He also removes the A10 speedy delete tags (the reason for the tag being that all that information is already in this article, and that his creations did not "expand upon, detail or improve information within the existing article(s) on the subject").

The result of his redirects to the two pages that were created against consensus is that they of course do not direct to this page.

This pattern of disruptive editing is rising to a level that is of concern.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)