Talk:Akananda and Bakananda

This page was proposed for deletion by TrangaBellam (talk · contribs) on 17 November 2021.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

India: West Bengal / History Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Deprod[edit]

First of all, this article definitely needs some attention because it is not clearly distinguishing between legend and actual history. But that in itself is not reason for deletion, it is reason for improvement.

I've removed the proposed deletion on this because I would like to understand better how people are coming to the conclusion that the sources are self-published. Of the four sources historyofbengal.com looks the most dubious to me, but even that is clearly not a one-person website. The other three are all published books in Bengali, so quite difficult for me to assess. Two of the publishers seem to be very small and apparently now defunct, but [Dey's publishing seems to still be with us, but without a functioning website. They claim the company "ranks among the top Bengali publishing houses of India." I'm not seeing a pirma facie case for any of these books being self-published.

English language sources for this subject are hard to come by, but it is covered in one book; Enamul Haque, ‎Enāmulahaqa, Chandraketugarh: A Treasure House of Bengal Terracottas ISBN 9848140026. The book Folklore Tradition Urbanity ISBN 8189620673 does not discuss the topic of our article, but it does mention Chakraborty's book in another context. Folklore seems to me to be a scholarly work, examining carefully the origins and motivations of folklore. Chakraborty is discussed in this context leading me to mark his book as reliable without evidence to the contrary. SpinningSpark 10:58, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Satish Chandra Mitra's volume was written over 100 years ago. Drafted as a nationalist response to then-dominant British perceptions of Indian History, Mitra made many claims that have failed to stand the test of time. We cannot use such old writings as sources without paying due regard to the contexts of production. Dey's reprinted the work in 2001 - that proves or disproves nothing.

The issue with historyofbengal.com is not whether it is a one-person website. Even if a hundred were involved, appropriate standard of historical scholarship is not met with. Likewise, Bangiya Loksanskriti Kosh is published by a local publisher who does not have any record of publishing decent scholarship in social sciences, and the work is hardly cited by anybody. Paschimbanger Sanskriti by Binoy Ghosh appears to be an acclaimed work.

Chandraketugarh: A Treasure House of Bengal Terracottas mentions the subject in the most trivial fashion, within a single page.TrangaBellam (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't think that is convincing enough to delete as a prod. The difference between your perspective and mine on this is that you are treating this article as alleged history that has no foundation. I am treating it as an article on mythology which gives the impression of historical fact through in-universe writing style. The first is a deletion case, the second is a cleanup case. Your belief that this was made up for political reasons does not change that. A vast swathe of Ancient Roman mythology is similarly a product of political considerations and national pride; see Aeneas for example. The truth is that much of mythology around the world has similar foundations. That does not stop mythological stories being notable. SpinningSpark 16:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]