This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Antonio Spadaro is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
User:DrFleischmanremoved the bibliography section, in good faith I think. However, it is standard to add a "works" section with books authored by the subject of an article, but not articles. Are these works books or articles please?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty standard to only include notable works, regardless of whether they're books or articles, especially when the list of non-notable works gets pretty long. This sometimes sorts out to "include books, not article" simply because books are often more notable than articles. This is why we have a WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY shortcut to the relevant section of WP:NOT. I routinely delete these sorts of bibliography sections when I see them. This has led to discussions from time to time; I can't remember a single time when the consensus was to keep the section. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:52, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like you to restore the "works" section then please. It sounds like a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT, but his books are relevant to his biography. Besides, this is not a stub with a long bibliography. The only potential issue I see is that the books are all in Italian, but that shouldn't be a problem. I see no good reason for your deletion.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how but you've misunderstood me. I thought I made my position pretty clear. Lengthy lists of non-notable works should not be included per WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY. There's nothing WP:IDONTLIKEIT about it, and suggesting that my policy-based position boils down to WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not constructive. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography to know what the strict rules are for biographical article. You and I disagree, so hopefully we can reach consensus with the help of other editors! Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
