Talk:Battle of Badr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleBattle of Badr is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleBattle of Badr has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 7, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 25, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 2, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 13, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
September 27, 2013Featured article reviewDemoted
September 6, 2020Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 17, 2007, March 17, 2008, March 17, 2009, March 17, 2010, March 13, 2012, March 13, 2014, and March 13, 2016.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article


(2024.03.11)

Untitled[edit]

Yo !!

I don't have the time right now to acquire the necessary knowledge about these 'old norse' formatting methods, rules or standards, so I am going to make this short and sweet:

There is a huge blunder in this article:

"In January 634, the same caravan made its way home" should be altered to "In January 624, the same caravan made its way home"

Just sayin'

My apologies for this appearing out of style.

Bye for now!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.88.236.56 (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revisionist Style of Narrative[edit]

The entire article presents the subject in the modern revisionist style and does not include an significant historical sources from the Muslim body of scholarship, except a few mentions from Ibn Hisham, Bukhari here and there. I am suggesting an inclusion of mainstream Muslim scholarship as well to balance out the extensive revisionist point of views prevalent. Moughera (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing touch up[edit]

The section short in in-line citation is a little bit of a jarring mismatch with the recent GA status - not sure if it was just taken as covered by the citation at the section end, but now that it's been challenged, this needs backfilling really. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2023[edit]

hi I dont want to edit this I wanted someone else too beacuse I feel that the term (attacking beliefs) is too harsh for an important figure in a big religion, of you could change it to be more neutral I would be grateful Tuckee (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. I don't have access to the cited source to verify it myself, but your rationale is insufficient for a change and is essentially WP:JDL. Cannolis (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2024[edit]

Please edit arabic date of Battle of Badr from Ramadan 2nd to Ramadan 17th. 82.13.211.34 (talk) 04:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. PianoDan (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
The reliable source detailing the correct date is as follows;
https://www.islamchannel.tv/blog-posts/on-this-day-the-battle-of-badr
Thanks Rasojp (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2024 (2)[edit]

RahilChoudhary004 (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I need to fix something in this article, the lines which I want to change are totally incorrect and showing hate towards Islam and it's followers, thus I request you to please let me fix something in the article and also have a checkpoint on the following paragraph in this article, your reply is mostly needed, thankyou. Yours Sincerely Rahil_Choudhary_04

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Jamedeus (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please guide me, about how I could change the lines or tell someone to do that, it would be very helpful , Jamedus
Waiting for your reply. RahilChoudhary004 (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The instructions are right there in the reply - just click the link on "autoconfirmed." PianoDan (talk) 19:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly let me edit by myself or someone do this, Remove these false allegations which were putted upon The prophet, peace be upon him.[edit]

I sincerely request the editors to please remove these false allegations ASAP.


I sincerely request the editors to please remove these false allegations ASAP.


"The latter had originally set out to protect their homeward-bound trade caravan that Muhammad was about to raid. Prior to this, Muhammad had ordered his followers to carry out several raids on Quraysh caravans, which, despite initial failures, finally succeeded in gaining their first plunder at Nakhla, when the Quraysh were observing a holy month forbidding them from shedding blood."


"The latter had originally set out to protect their homeward-bound trade caravan that Muhammad was about to raid.[9][2] Prior to this, Muhammad had ordered his followers to carry out several raids on Quraysh caravans, which, despite initial failures, finally succeeded in gaining their first plunder at Nakhla, when the Quraysh were observing a holy month forbidding them from shedding blood.[10][11] RahilChoudhary004 (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit this info as early as possible. This is misleading and totally false Pacificpeace (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove image[edit]

Hi,

Can someone kindly remove the image which is so called depicted the Holy Prophet ﷺ as this is a cause of great disrespect.

Thanks. Rasojp (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rasojp: No, sorry; this is an encyclopedia, not a religious text, and the historical image is relevant to the content. Please see WP:NOTCENSORED. General Ization Talk 02:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if this is not considered a religious text, in Islam any image depicting the Prophet ﷺ is a cause if disrespect, therefore I would like to kindly implore you to replace this image with a map of the location of 'Badr' where this historical battle took place.
Many thanks. Rasojp (talk) 02:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please review WP:NOTCENSORED, specifically:

Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia.

...

Some articles may include images, text, or links which are relevant to the topic but that some people find objectionable. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should usually focus not on its potential offensiveness but on whether it is an appropriate image, text, or link. Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for the removal of content.

Jamedeus (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]