Talk:Birthright generation

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hulahoophoua.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan?[edit]

No links? I linked here from "Citizenship in United States" HalFonts (talk) 07:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger?[edit]

It's been suggested that this article should be merged into Anchor baby, but I think Birthright citizenship in the United States would be a better merge target. I would hesitate to merge this article's material into Anchor baby because that article is supposed to be specifically about the derogatory epithet, not about the citizenship law controversy in general. Comments? Richwales (talk · contribs) 06:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Factual Error[edit]

The 14th Amendment does NOT "grant American citizenship to all born on American soil." If it did, there would be no "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," phrase - noting the word AND as operative. Constitutionally, a birth on U.S. soil is only half the requirement for citizenship at birth. If it were meant that this group believes that birthplace is the sole requirement, such can be written better than (it is) currently.

The above may be better said in the article about the Amendment itself, but the error was made here, not in the Amendment's article. 71.106.213.194 (talk) 08:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]