Talk:Blood of the Samurai

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a subject that was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally and for lack of asserted importance, because it does appear to be an actual movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0306568/ The page author failed to explain that it's a movie or include anything other than a synopsis, but it does appear to not be simply made up. --IagoQnsi (talk) 04:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IagoQns: Thank you for the link to IMDB. I've removed the speedy tag and added that to the EL section of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 05:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I only noticed it because the first version of the page (speedy deleted for copyvio) included info about it being a film -- without having seen that, I probably would have tagged it WP:A11 as well. -IagoQnsi (talk) 05:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]