Talk:Blue skies research

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Comments[edit]

This is an ongoing article, that i plan to add to when i come across additional examples, to extend its variety.

It needs Categories and References. EagleFan (talk) 00:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping my very first article - what a miracle. What a struggle! The problem with the article now it seems rather devoid of the dynamism an spirit i wrote the original in. It also only covers the corporate side, an so its only 50% representative of its usage. For example, if an author stephen king droped i think his heart my sink. 'Blue sky research' sounds rather limiting, which is why originally avoided choosing that as the title. I dont know, maybe we could do some sort of collaborative revamp.

after all, it looks like the great wikipedia handnt heard of the title till i added an article about. An ive been studying blue sky science for 2 decades! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vcorani (talk • contribs) 17:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Subjects section"[edit]

Contributes nothing to the page, is frankly meaningless (BSR can take place in any field and on any topic), and is poorly written, e.g. "Owing to its radical nature"... Is there any reason not to delete it outright?

195.137.110.134 (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blue skies research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology[edit]

"The term blue sky research probably comes from the notion that such research does not relate to what is on the ground realities about rather to 'untouchable' sky. "

This phrase is awkward, spurious, and unsupported by citations. It's need to be rewritten and/or removed. Halogenated (talk) 13:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]