Talk:Cathedral of Ani/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 06:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Very well written. See Comments below on required translations.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	lead: ok; layout: ok; weasel: none; fiction: n/a; lists: n/a
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	One minor fix, see Comments below.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Only matches are directly attributed quotations.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Seems admirably comprehensive.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Clear and well focussed.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No issues.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All are on Commons. I was not able to check all the Armenian sources, which are stated to be CC-by-SA.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Well, this is an easy pass. An excellent article on a major but little-known architectural masterpiece. Good work.

Comments[edit]

Note i is in Armenian and requires an English translation.

Done --Երևանցի ^talk 10:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 36 contains a quotation that requires an English translation.

Done --Երևանցի ^talk 10:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 53 contains a quotation that requires an English translation.

Ref 63 title requires an English translation.

Done --Երևանցի ^talk 10:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 112 requires an English translation.

Done --Երևանցի ^talk 10:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: the Vardanian (2000) citation is unused and should be moved to Further reading.

Done --Երևանցի ^talk 10:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]