Talk:Chinese social relations

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Merge Guanxi?[edit]

Well, guanxi appears now in the new version of Oxford Dictionary. We should see its significances in showing the special interpersonal relationship in the Chinese society. I don't prefer a merge here -- Jerry Crimson Mann 06:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also object the merge proposal. If it's appearing in a dictionary with reputation, it's not even necessary to italicise the term. (The relevant edits by user:Alanmak were [1] [2].) — Insta ntnood 08:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC) (modified 17:27, 28 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

DON'T MERGE. This is a word that is increasing in usage to describe more than simply a subset of "Chinese social relations". --Shannonr 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the "merge" issue appears settled, with guanxi staying where it is. --Shannonr 11:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support: I'd like to bring this back up - this article should absolutely be deleted or merged with gaunxi. Chinese social relations, or shehuiguanxi, are adequately described in the "In a personal context" of the guanxi article. This stub provides no additional information on the topic. Additionally, it doesn't really make sense to read about shehuiguanxi without considering the broader concept of guanxi. 李艾连 (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]