Talk:Claude Eatherly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know how to fix the page, but the big block quote starting "Whilst in no sense" is from the Anders/Eartherly book, page 6. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.182.56.12 (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

211.50.61.226: I think there may be some good information in the changes you made that could be incorporated into the article if done properly. I reverted your changes because they seem designed to advance a thesis (that Eatherly's post-bombing remorse and pre-bombing wartime activity were exaggerated) but relies mostly on third-person allegations rather than cited facts, and furthermore you deleted material that contradicts your preferred interpretation, including Eartherly's own written testimony.

Your section that reads:

"However, famed author William Bradford Huie wrote an expose of the case called The Hiroshima Pilot. He pointed out Eartherly's was no different then the experience of many other men in the war. He said Eatherly actually saw very little combat. Huie's book made it clear Eatherly was but a small time thief and criminal who merely used Hiroshima as an excuse."

would be a useful addition to this article if made as an addition (not replacement) of the material already there, and if it described more of the factual information that Huie used to draw his conclusions. Perhaps you could quote directly from Huie's book and also describe what makes Huie "famed" as an authority on this subject. -Moorlock 23:35, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Its not my topic but Huie was famed for being an author, not for being an authority on the topic of Claude Eatherly.--Buckboard 09:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Huie's opinions are no more valid than yours or mine on the topic. I vote that this section to be deleted. 2.101.52.103 (talk) 08:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 06:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing and citation issues[edit]

I have tagged this article for problems with the named references and for lack of inline citations. The references seem to be in the "Further reading' section and few if any have complete publication data, i.e. name of publisher, date of publication, year, ISBN. There are very few inline citations and those that are there do not include page numbers. Some of the sources listed appear to be original research or self published, but it is hard to tell because of a lack of publication information. Cuprum17 (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claude Eatherly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]