Talk:Claude François de Malet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Language & usage concerns[edit]

The language and grammar used in the majority of this article is archaic. It leads to the conclusion This article is either a direct translation of an article originally written in French, or has been directly copied from a much older text -- or both. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been written by a non-English speaker. I've located the sources all of which are correct, and rewriting and adding in-line citations. Will be finished in a day or so. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done for now.Truthkeeper88 (talk) 00:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have assessed this article as a Start class article. Please note that Mil Hist project doesn't use C class, hence as it does not quite fulfill B class criteria it is therefore a Start. Having said this, it is a very good Start class article. It just needs those last few citations and it would be a B class in my opinion. Well down Truthkeeper for the rewrite. Cheers. —… AustralianRupert (talk) 01:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it's best to delete the two sentences that are lacking citations. I've read all the source material and can't find those facts. If one of the original editors returns and can cite the relevant statements then it would be fine to add them back. Thanks for having a look, and for deleting the extra bracket. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One of the sources came up as a dead link (although it was live only a few days ago) so a new reference has been added, and now the entire article is cited.Truthkeeper88 (talk) 17:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claude François de Malet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]