Talk:Districts of the Unitarian Universalist Association
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Districts of the Unitarian Universalist Association article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on September 3, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Districts should all be renamed[edit]
All of the individual district articles should be renamed (moved to new articles). The article names are simply too general. Northeast District, Southwest District... of what? There are vast numbers of organizations which have different districts and which might well have northeast and southwest districts. Probably all of them should start with the word Unitarian. --Xyzzyplugh 14:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- When making these articles, I just used the normal names, without qualifiers, because that's what I had seen done with other articles (see Sunshine District, Dixie District, Far Western District, all Barbershop Harmony Society districts, with no qualifiers). What I've seen done in similar situations is simply going along with un-qualified (un-disambiguated) article titles, until a conflict arises, and dealing with it then. The only conflict existing right now, is with the Southwest District; there's also a Southwest District (BHS). But that was handeled with a simple disambig. note at the top of the page. However, I'm certainly open to discussion on the matter. HellaNorCal 22:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't a big deal for me personally, I won't be getting involved in this. I think that eventually there will be a conflict with other groups of articles, and that these will all be renamed eventually, so my thinking is it would be better to do it now. But, it's certainly no crisis if you want to leave them as they are for now. --Xyzzyplugh 23:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmk. Thank you for your input. I'm thinking I'll leave them as they are for now, but I won't wait for a conflict to arise. I simply have a lot more to do first. HellaNorCal 05:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- This isn't a big deal for me personally, I won't be getting involved in this. I think that eventually there will be a conflict with other groups of articles, and that these will all be renamed eventually, so my thinking is it would be better to do it now. But, it's certainly no crisis if you want to leave them as they are for now. --Xyzzyplugh 23:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
wiki webhosting[edit]
Without getting personal, i would like to refer to Comparison_of_wiki_farms, where (at the pages of a wiki domain) content can be edited in a similar way like here on wikipedia. Personally i know pbWiki service is used for an online church.
Using external wiki webhosting, you (or any other editor editing the articles) are the domain (URL) maintainer, and there are none of the wikipedia policies. See also WP:WP. It is a question of consensus; very difficult to make an exception. We would have to allow other, for instance business, directories.
I would like to express seeing the articles being good faith creations, it is just they do not meet several wikipedia policies. I have no personal interest to get the articles deleted (unless some other articles on the afd discussion). I am new here myself, but it is 100% allright to question articles. Hope this means a few misunderstandings less. User:Yy-bo 19:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Districts of the Unitarian Universalist Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100421101434/http://www.uua.org:80/aboutus/professionalstaff/congregationallife/144750.shtml to http://www.uua.org/aboutus/professionalstaff/congregationallife/144750.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)