Talk:E-Hentai

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hentai work group.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

A fact from E-Hentai appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the file-sharing website E-Hentai has been called the Library of Alexandria of hentai?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/E-Hentai.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

~~... that the deletion of the hentai file sharing website E-Hentai was compared to the burning of the Library of Alexandria?~~ Source: Vice
- ALT1:... that the file-sharing website E-Hentai has been called the Library of Alexandria of hentai? Source: Vice

Reviewed: Hollaback Girl
Comment: A silly hook about one of the more seedy and unexpectedly resilient websites on the old internet. The site has received limited mainstream press coverage beyond its sudden shutdown and abrupt revival in 2019 so a more conservative reviewer will probably find some of the primary sources I've cited in the article to be dubious, but I decided to submit it for DYK regardless.

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

A forum, in this case the website's forum, cannot be used as a reliable source. Deviantart isn't a reliable source either. I doubt that the 4Gamers source is reliable because the article writer's name translates into what is obviously a username. I also don't see how a college thesis can be considered a reliable source. SL93 (talk) 00:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that per WP:SCHOLARSHIP, a thesis can be a reliable source. In any case, given the necessity of reliance on primary sources for this topic due to a lack of secondary sources, it is clear that this article will not pass a review by User:SL93; unless another editor wants to give this nomination a second opinion, it should be withdrawn from DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 03:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it could be, depending on who wrote it and if it's peer reviewed. I'm fine with another opinion, but I personally don't see anything changing. SL93 (talk) 03:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second review: I don't find a problem with the two thesis papers, which account for a grand total of 3 cites in the article. People often quote theses for obscure topics, and they do not have to be "peer reviewed". As for the rest of the article, there are numerous RS such as Vice and The Daily Dot, and Deviantart even has a wiki page. I think the page creator has made an effort to write this in an encyclopedic way.
The first hook is not found in the source but the ALT1 is, so let's go with that. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: I personally consider them unreliable sources. Though the 4Gamers source is for sure unreliable and so is the Deviantart source because it is isn't directly from them. Deviantart is a website to share images and the link goes to an image that a user uploaded. SL93 (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan695, can you remove these non-RS? If not, I guess we'll take your suggestion of just withdrawing this. Yoninah (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: I am fine with the thesis papers at this point. I accept your explanation for those. SL93 (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: Removed the sources. Morgan695 (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. SL93, does this meet your approval now? Yoninah (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It will once the 4Gamers source is taken care of. SL93 (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Morgan695: Yoninah (talk) 20:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SL93 Yoninah Ah sorry, removed the wrong thing. It's resolved now. Morgan695 (talk) 20:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring tick. SL93 (talk) 20:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Morgan695:@SL93: Thank you both. Yoninah (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]