Talk:Elizam Escobar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Escobarpainting .jpg[edit]

Image:Escobarpainting .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorist[edit]

I am having trouble with accepting the word terrorist as not being POV:

a Marxist-Leninist terrorist group which fought to transform Puerto Rico into a communist state during the 1970

What bothers me with the word terrorist is that a person or group may be considered as terrorist by some people, groups and countries, while on the same hand these same people may be considered as heroes and patriots by other people. groups and countries. Therefore the word terrorist, which in my opinion is a POV term, should be removed as required by Wikipedia policy. A clear example were the early Colonists in what was to become the United States. When they protested against British rule, they were considered as terrorists for their acts (such as the Boston Tea Party) yet those who opposed British rule considered them as heroes and patriots.

I am asking that the term in question be removed in accordance to policy, thereby permitting our readers to reach their own conclusions. I am, however going to suggest that instead of including the statement as such "a Stalinist terrorist group which fought to transform Puerto Rico into a communist state during the 1970s", which as I stated would be POV, is that instead it be written as " considered a Stalinist terrorist group by the United States which fought to transform Puerto Rico into a communist state during the 1970s" with a source and that way it will not seem as a POV statement. The same should apply to the term political prisoners. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with that.
But I have to point out that part of what makes a group terroristic, is that they have no caring for civilian lives and try to make political change using fear.
The US colonists didn't do that.
Neosiber (talk) 23:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizam Escobar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizam Escobar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Elizam_Escobar&oldid=1207133672"