Talk:Epic Victory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Epic Victory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number Built[edit]

I see that the number built in the box has shown 16 for quite some time, but I believe they only ever built a prototype. Epic Aircraft states only one Victory was built, but no source is given. I've updated it to one here as I believe that to be correct, still looking for a source to verify. Retswerb (talk) 00:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The FAA registry shows the one prototype, N370EJ has been deregistered. There is another one, N952R, but it is powered by a turboprop??? - Ahunt (talk) 00:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That must be... interesting... to have a turboprop there! :-) Looks like an LT or an E1000 to me: [1] Retswerb (talk) 01:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It must be an error in the FAA database! - Ahunt (talk) 01:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The current LT was not registered until 2015, in 2013 it was previously a "Victory Jet" #002 (which had been previously N975AR from 2009). MilborneOne (talk) 14:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]