Talk:European civil code

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union High‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality of the article[edit]

I have an impression that the article was not written in accordance with the neutral point of view rules. In fact, there are not so many voices dissenting to the Code, the discussion is rather concentrated on its binding nature. There are no sources in the article. I'll try to improve it in prompt future. Montessquieu (talk) 16:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above post is based on personal impression: but how can one state that "there are not so many voices dissenting to the code" when a large part of commentaries, from different viewpoints, harshly criticise the project itself and now the structure and content of the DCFR? a long review of articles and books dealing with this matter will likely be published on the Web Journal of Current Legal Issues next January: wait and read. (User: Luponti) --- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luponti (talk • contribs) 17:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]