Talk:Fire (1996 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fire (1996 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Canadian / Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Need for Balance[edit]

Agreed but what about the others? Is there a balanced POV?

202.156.6.54 07:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As there are no other reviews cited in this article, I'm not sure what precisely you're referring to. Rebecca 07:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to find reviews on the main page (Deepa Mehta) of her films and many of them are Pro-Mehta as an activist (particularly for women's issues) etc. I believe it would be informative for readers to know what some (some) feminists feel about her work.

202.156.6.54 07:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Plot Summary[edit]

I find this plot summary to be particularly focused on the masculine aspects of the plot. I find this pretty insulting considering this is a movie about a relationship between two women. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FelixFortuna (talk • contribs) 12:21, 13 July 2007.

If you can see changes that need to be made, feel free to make them. --Beloved freak 14:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

editing this page for class project[edit]

Hi there! I'll be editing this page over the next few days for a class project for a college class. I'll be addressing events that surrounding the screening of the film in India, as well as well as the public dialogue around it, and linking it up to related topics. Lokchi (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fire (1996 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19981213/34750024.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/__e52568520028afa7.nsf/0/652e99a7c2bc0a796525693e005c85db%21OpenDocument%26Highlight%3D0%2Cfire
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19981209/34350564.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19981203/33750654.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080202203950/http://media.opencultures.net/queer/ to http://media.opencultures.net/queer/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/__e52568520028afa7.nsf/0/652e99a7c2bc0a796525693e005c85db%21OpenDocument%26Highlight%3D0%2Cfire

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]