Talk:Flag of Moldova

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two-sided?[edit]

Neither FOTW or flags.net appear to indicate that the obverse and reverse sides of this flag differ, yet the article states this as fact (and provides an illustration). What's the source of this claim? Is the design actually supposed to be two-sided? --ScottMainwaring 05:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the official website of the President of the Republic Moldova. More precisely, from here (in Romanian) (same link, in English). Here is an interesting thing: this is supposed to be the state flag; but if you track pictures with the flag in the background, you can see that the coat of arms appears on the reverse as well, but mirrored (as on the flag of Spain). This may be caused by the fact that the cloth of the flag is too thin, and the printed image of the coat of arms appears mirrored. I just suppose, because I don't live in Moldova. ES Vic 14:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! (Strangely, the English link doesn't address the question, but the Romanian link clearly shows a two-sided design.) --ScottMainwaring 22:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm watching a Moldovan TV news program right now (the NIT "Curier" evening news broadcast from July 31, 2007), and one of the stories is showing a Moldovan flag flying on a pole. The view is from the reverse (obvious from the arrangement of colours), and the coat of arms (with the eagle facing to the right) is IMHO too crisp and distinct to be something accidentally showing through thin cloth. I'll try to grab a screen shot of what I'm seeing and post it so people can judge for themselves. Richwales 22:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Check out these screen shots. Note that the coat of arms is clearly visible on the reverse of these flags (first two shots). The third shot shows the front of the same flag as the second shot; note that the coat of arms is equally distinct on both sides of this flag, so I doubt it's simply showing through the fabric from the front to the back. Richwales 23:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You may well be right, that there are Moldovan flags in use with the coat of arms printed on both sides. But IMHO I don't think this is particularly noteworthy or unexpected -- there are often unapproved, unofficial variants of flags sighted. I suppose if there were evidence that these "CoA on both sides" flags were in fact the norm in Moldova, that would be noteworthy. As would evidence that such flags had some sort of official status. But without such documentation, I don't think the article needs to address these variants. --ScottMainwaring 01:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that one of the flags is on an official (military) vehicle seems, to me, to lend it the kind of credence you suggest is needed. Richwales 01:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a new hypothesis: the CoA is printed only on one side, but because of the thinnes of the material used for the flag, one can see the CoA on the other side as if it would be printed. The best thing would be if a Moldavian wikikpedian would upload a picture of a flag in actual use in RM. ES Vic (talk) 15:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moldovan Flag Reverse Side.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Moldovan Flag Reverse Side.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Flag of Moldova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flag of Moldova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]