Francesco Caracciolo-class battleship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Conway's gives the name as simply "Caracciolo-class", and I believe Jane's does as well. Is the "full ship name" or the "shortened name" the more common one? - The BushrangerOne ping only 19:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How on earth did a skimpy 15K article get to be a FP? That's nowhere near long enough to get an adequate coverage. Another FP on Italian battleships that only had 3 ships in it is twice as long: Conte di Cavour-class battleship SMH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.13.227 (talk) 01:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nowhere at WP:FAC establishes that articles must be 50K long. (CC)Tbhotch™ 01:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to note that the class with the article "twice as long" was...um...actually built. - The BushrangerOne ping only 02:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]