Talk:Freeheld

A fact from Freeheld appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 October 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the upcoming film Freeheld is based on the true story of a police officer's battle to transfer her pension to her domestic partner?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/October.

Wikipedia

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Requested move 27 June 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have consensus that this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC among WP:TWODABS. This was somewhat close, but I find the support arguments more persuasive in suggesting that the current setup is not efficient in serving readers. Cúchullain ^t/c 16:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Freeheld (2015 film) → Freeheld – Only uses of "Freeheld" are the two films, and page views over the last twelve months strongly favour the 2015 version. I appreciate that this might be considered recentism, but I think objectively a feature film with an A-list cast is always going to have broader appeal than a documentary short. PC78 (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 10:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting (2nd) Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose An Oscar-winning documentary that serves as the basis of the critically panned 2015 film has more long-term encyclopedic significance, so there is no primary topic. Let the views settle a bit too - they likely look more impressive because the film recently came out. Nohomersryan (talk) 13:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- An award win, even if it is an Oscar, is a fairly week argument for long term significance. Critical reception has no bearing on notability. PC78 (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Freeheld should be the disambig page for both articles. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support WP:TWODABS situation, agree with nom that feature films are more appealing than documentaries. Timmyshin (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support the current setup isn't working when more people view the disambiguation page than the other article. SST flyer 07:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per SSTflyer - a much better solution for our readers. Dohn joe (talk) 15:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose leave dab at base 2601:541:4305:C70:3180:10E7:2042:B06F (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The 2007 film gets 60 views a day while the 2015 film gets 908 views a day.[1] We must base our decision on current stats and not anticipate the future, per WP:CRYSTALBALL. The disambiguation page gets 38 views a day, or 4 percent of traffic. If disambiguation is done properly, this figure should be under 2 percent. Gulangyu (talk) 14:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.