Talk:G.B.F. (film)

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on G.B.F. (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131220083519/http://gawker.com/g-b-f-was-rated-r-for-being-gay-1485807841 to http://gawker.com/g-b-f-was-rated-r-for-being-gay-1485807841

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to Wikipedia so that is why I am not editing the page itself. I would prefer it someone else makes the edits if they agree with me. I think part of the cast description is inaccurate. "Evanna Lynch as McKenzie Pryce, a mean-spirited, puritanical Mormon, who believes the LGBT community to be evil." I just finished watching the movie and I don't believe this character was Mormon, but some other undisclosed Christian sect. First, the movie never states that McKenzie was Mormon, just a member of the "Christian click" and "OMG club". Second, if she was Mormon it would be counteract two of the jokes (which imo were hilarious) that the writers were playing at. Joke 1: McKenzie is mad at Shley (stated as Mormon) because she is trying to get a gay best friend. McKenzie accuses Shley of going along with the Mormon thing because her pastor stated that the gay conspiracy was trying to get polygamy legal. She specifically said "pastor" which I think rules out her being Mormon since I don't think they have pastors (protestants i think?). The joke is making fun of the slippery slope argument conservatives tend to use when it comes to gay marriage. Also making fun of the fact that Mormons have associations with "sister wives" which I think she mentions. This joke doesn't work if McKenzie is Mormon. Joke 2: Mormons are hypocritical. The Mormons in the movie seem to want to be super friendly and nice to people while believing that they are going to hell. The Mormons were trying to convert "the gays" to "only be gay for Jesus". Both disclosed Mormon character saw certain behavior "sinful" behavior as acceptable and ok under certain conditions that they would rationalize to themselves (except for swearing lol). The joke doesn't work if McKenzie "the mean-spirited puritan" who never compromises on her standards is Mormon. So I would like to see the description changed to either "...a mean-spirited, puritan..." or "...a mean-spirited, puritanical Christian..." (in one scene she wears a citation of a new testament verse on her face and if I remember correctly she also has a symbol of a cross in one scene) as I think that is more accurate. Hope this helps :)

Redlink[edit]

In the section "Plot", it had a red link on the words "gay best friend" (Wikipedia does not hav an article with said exact title). So i simply removed the link, so said words currently don't link to anything. Okay? As i mention on my User Talk page, i think red links look ugly. Solomonfromfinland (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Solomonfromfinland: Hello, per WP:REDLINK, "Red links are for subjects that should have articles but do not. They are not only acceptable, but needed in articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Only remove red links if you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." Red links should not be removed because they are ugly. Regarding this topic, it appears to be a valid one for which an article could be created: The New York Times, Advocate. Google Scholar shows various result here. I'd suggest going ahead and creating such an article in a stub form. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think there should be an article "Gay best friend"? Or do you think said term should redirect to this article, "G.B.F. (film)"? Solomonfromfinland (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]