This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Questionable practices of its sister company[edit]
This section needs more references as well as a clean up. It shouldn't take over the article as it appears WP:RECENTISM and WP:COATRACK.NZFC(talk)(cont) 11:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The editor who added the criticism of a sister company, AviaticMRO, was Spontiac (talk·contribs). I left a note to see if they want to join this discussion, though they have not been active since 11 February. Per WP:COAT we don't usually like to see short articles containing lots of negative material. We do not have an article on AviaticMRO, so how come its tribulations need to be discussed in the GetJet Airlines article? The header of the new section added by Spontiac was "Association with bribery allegations of its parent company". What published sources use the word 'bribery'?. At this point we are deep into the area of BLP violations. EdJohnston (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy for it to be removed. I'm sorry I reverted IP and their account as at the time it looked like vandalism, especially using "Fake news" but they appear to be right and information isn't relevant for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NZFC (talk • contribs) 09:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}