Talk:Greenford High School

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: Needs refs and infobox. Pics good Victuallers 16:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Can we please make this article more relevant? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.90.116 (talk) 22:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

This article is essentially an advert for the school. It isn't what Wikipedia is for. Does anyone have the knowledge of the school necessary to write a more balanced and information-based article? At the moment I've added an NPOV tag to it. Ed zeppelin (talk) 19:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - the sections on 'sixth form' and 'staff' demonstrate clear bias. Little is said that is notable about the school, but it sounds as if it's been lifted from the school prospectus. Even the ofsted quote (in suspiciously large text) is not notable. I suggest deleting both sections.

Bugsysiegel71 (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree, there is not a shred of criticism in the article, I suspect the school itself is using wikipedia to publish promotional material for the school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.25.178.19 (talk) 13:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV template without ongoing discussion per Template:POV instructions[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]