Talk:Greenville, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scenes from the movie Pink Cadillac starring Clint Eastwood were filmed in Greenville. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100D:B06D:D4:C0D0:EF46:AF66:9B71 (talk) 22:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greenville, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reports of its death are greatly exaggerated[edit]

Someone changed verbs to past tense in the belief that the town has ceased to exist because must of the buildings burned. That happened to the town of Paradise, CA, a few years ago, and it rebuilt. It happened to this town in 1881, and it rebuilt. Streets and land titles still exist. If people had fire insurance, they can rebuild. If not, someone might buy the land, which is still valuable, and build on it. Tax bills, adjusted for lowered value, will doubtless still go out. I’ve not seen references supporting the claim that no one will ever reside there or operate a business in the future, and that the village is no more. Edison (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It seems it is occurring frequently over the last few days. I reverted it from 'was' to 'is', too. --P37307 (talk) 00:06, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Any edit that changes the article from "is" to "was" should be reverted immediately. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 01:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your point but we need to be very careful with our language. Greenfield is not a "town", which in California, means a legally incorporated entity with a mayor, elected town council and so on. Greenfield is an unincorporated community, and a census designated place with no local government. Government services are provided by Plumas County. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should apply to categories, also, like Category:Destroyed towns. I reverted this one because it's too soon to determine if it is destroyed permanently, as the category introduction states. The news media, including reliable sources, are making no distinction to legal status of the community and it being a real "town" but I guess it could be considered a living, "Ghost Town" without legal designation.--P37307 (talk) 21:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Far too many in the news media care more about "click bait" titles than the truth. Reality is the Greenville wasn't 100% destoryed, though many article titles are worded in a way to make it sound like it was 100% destroyed. I would bet that many in the news media aren't even aware that each state has different legal descriptions of their communities (see page 3). Also, 75% destoryed is not a "ghost town" or a "living ghost town either", instead it would still be an "unincorporated community. Only time will reveal if the U.S. Census Bureau will remove the "Census Designated Place" (CDP) description for Greenville. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 16:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to imply it was a ghost town. lol. My point was even places that have been gone for hundred years and abandoned still get called "town". I was sticking it to poor reporting. --P37307 (talk) 19:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even towns that are completely destroyed and haven't been used for decades such as Plymouth, Montserrat are designated with ís' and not 'was'. Someone Not Awful (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The buildings in Plymouth are certainly ruined, but they're still there, clearly laid out in a town-like fashion. Deserted, yes, destroyed, no. Same as in Greenville, the question of whether any semipermanent human settlement "was" shouldn't even arise till it's at least mostly indiscernable from however the local wilderness appears (and that usually takes centuries, sometimes decades, never a week or so). InedibleHulk (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Writing 1 MW[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 13 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dkim3029 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Dkim3029 (talk) 23:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]