Talk:Guilty Pleasures (novel)

Novels: Crime Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To do[edit]

I've rated this as a start class article. IMHO, the article needs:

Info for other releases
Other covers
More detailed description of minor characters
Links to any verifiable reviews
An overall check for any other items missing from the template
~~Work out disambiguation issues with Guilty Pleasures.~~

I know that we don't normally edit other's text, but please feel free to add or strike items above and add a note below regarding any amendments. TheronJ 16:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notes regarding amendments to list[edit]

Added disambiguation note. TheronJ 16:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finished disambiguation. TheronJ 16:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Comic Adaptions[edit]

I was just wondering if anyone was planning on writing a page for the Guilty Pleasures comic book that is currently being released. It is an adaption mentioned on this page, but I was wondering if it is going to be built on?

Fair use rationale for Image:Guilty Pleasures.png[edit]

Image:Guilty Pleasures.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up[edit]

I've started doing a lot of cleanup on the article and ended up removing or heavily editing several parts. One of the things I've removed is the "major themes" section as it read sort of like original research on part of the novel and to be honest, would probably be better served at a page for the series as a whole, which is long overdue for creation. (I'll put it on my to-do list.) I pared down the sections of characters, linking instead to the big page for all the characters. I've moved several parts there since that's where we need the more in-depth list of character details and such. As far as deaths in each book go, that's pretty much trivia and was removed on that basis since a good book synopsis would do the job a lot better.Tokyogirl79 (talk)