A fact from Hermann Wiedemann appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This article is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. The problem is with the hook which tries to include too much information, plus the fact that he did not appear as Beckmesser 196 times. Would ALT1 be an acceptable substitute? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I thought the comma took care of the number. If only we could just say "the legendary Toscanini recording", - that would be concise. ALT1 is a great approach, but "took" sounds a bit as if it was his activity, while it was a great honour to be the one. So trying hookiness, although I dislike to disturb chronology, and importance of roles:
I think we can approve ALT1 and ALT2. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@LouisAlain: When you translate text from another language Wikipedia, please mention this fact in the edit summary, as mentioned here. For example, you could use "Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at de:Exact name of German article; see its history for attribution." This requirement is in addition to the excellent translation tag you regularly add to the article talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
LouisAlain mentions that on the talk, even citing the version translated. That is far more transparent than somewhere in an edit summary. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer ALT2, because - as explained - that "took". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]