Talk:IKCO Samand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About the quality of the article[edit]

This is a biased opinion! Does Samand resembles Ford's, which ford? If any it resembles BMW Rover!

Re: The car’s main flaw is said to be the driver’s view! Who is the source for that comment?

Re: The car's quality is disputed with some people being skeptical, and others loyal to the brand. This is a crap statement! Where is the fact in this statement? Of course there are always skeptical and loyal people but where is the technical expert source that questions the quality?

This is Wiki and there are rules in what you post here! Facts and proofs no rumors and chitchat!

Kiumars

This is getting worse! Guys you need to provide facts not rumors and claims!

Re: …when they supplied Peugeot 504 engines for the previous Paykan model. Not all Paykans had Peugeot engines!

What do you mean by “The design is sometimes unscientifically claimed to be more aerodynamic than the Peugeot 405 it is based on.” If you know it is unscientific and baseless what is the point in mentioning it at all? What is the point in posting rumors and gossips? You must provide sources (Test-Lab results, etc) to support your statements. Who says the design is based on Peugeot and that it is more aerodynamic! Where is the Test-Lab results?

If we do not adhere to these principals we better just publish a commercial weekly cars review magazine here!

WTF does this statement “thanks to an arrangement with that car's original manufacturer, Rootes. In a connection typical of the car industry, Rootes was eventually taken over by Peugeot.” mean?

What does this mean "It has been suggested that the former President of Iran, Mohammad Khatami, proposed this name for the car"? Suggested by who, and what significant this statement has?

I need authentic technical reference (and test-lab results where appropriate) for the following statements:

1. Some of the vehicle is based on technology from the Peugeot 405 (using the xu7jpk and xu7jp/l3 engines),

2. steering is said to outperform the 405 too.

3. The car's main flaw is said to be the driver's view

4. The car's quality is disputed

If you cannot provide authentic references to support a statement don’t put it on WIKI. Kiumars


Hi Kiumars, I agree with you that this article needs a lot of work. I'm interested in it because I'm interested in the original Hillman Hunter, but I don't know enough about the Peykan to add new data to the article. I've previously cleaned up the language a bit and make it more neutral, but that's about all.
To reply to two of your specific points: "unscientific" does not neccessarily mean "baseless", so if that statement can be justified with things like (for example) media reports showing these opinions, then it may be acceptable. Wikipedia can reflect society as well as science, so long as it's factual and not original research.
Finally, the thing about Peugeot and Rootes is there to explain that there is an interesting co-incidence within the story (the Peugeot connection). I think it's fair enough to point the reader towards a contemplation of the number of collaborations and mergers which go on in the car industry, since this article is about a vehicle which resulted from a relationship between companies. Maybe some "See also" links to some other similar projects (like Fiat's "world cars" and Eastern European deals, or the Morris Oxford-based Hindustan Ambassador) would be helpful. What do you think? – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 14:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kieran ,

Re: "unscientific" does not necessarily mean "baseless".

I am an engineer myslef, We are talking about a Car here, and must provide engineering reports to support any claims and comparisons. Take a look at BMW pages on the Wiki, can you see any unscientific remarks there?

Re: things like (for example) media reports showing these opinions.

In that case the URL to the source (e.g. the media report) must be added so that people can read and decide for themselves, there are lots of rubbish biased media out there!

Kieran I am sure you agree that lots of the negative remarks made about Samand here are a negative marketing campaign against Samand when more and more countries are showing interest in purchasing production lines. WIKI must not be used for this kind of campaigns. Look at other pages about other cars and see if you can find such negative and biased remarks. We are talking about an engineering product and any claims must be supported by engineering and scientific tests otherwise is baseless and biased.

With regard to the history of Peugeot and Rootes, the article in its current format implies that Samand is a copy of Peugeot and that is why I insisted on providing profs. Peugeot has a project in Iran that will start production soon but it is much smaller than Samand project. Benz is about to start a production line in Iran too, so are many other car manufactureres.

Samand and Paykan are totally different products I have some information about Paykan and I will try to put them together for you but I think Paykan needs its own page and should not be mixed with Samand. There are other interesting Iranian cars too, from Jiaan to Cadillac! But the important thing about Samand is that it is 85% made in Iran and many countries have shown interest in buying production line.

You may find this forum interesting (Some photos and news but not a reliable reference like WIKI!) http://skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=334883

PS: I still stand by my objections mentioned above.

Copying in conversation from a user talk page (contains suggested course of action)[edit]

Samand

The neutrality, authenticity and accuracy of this article is strongly disputed. Provide authentic references or delete it please. Kiumars

Hi Kiumars. I didn't put any of the disputed facts (nor indeed anything much) into the Samand article, and I have no idea where one would find those references. You need to look at the edit history of the article to find out who added the information, then approach them. (If it looks like I added them, that's because I tidied up the use of English and removed some extreme points-of-view once before, but the original content is not mine.)
As for deletion, you need to nominate the article for deletion using the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion protocol. But since the car exists, I doubt you'd succeed in persuading enough people to get a consensus for deletion. Best to just be bold and delete all the statements you're sure are false or not neutral, but leave the core facts. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 12:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kieran, If I am not mistaken you are saying someone dumped lots of rubbish here and we are stuck with it, right? In that case as you and I seem to be the only people interested on the article let’s agree on a unbiased and informative context. OK?

PS: I found this site about Paykan (Rootes-Chrysler) you may find interesting (I bet you already seen it!). http://www.rootes-chrysler.co.uk/paykan.html Kiumars 14:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'm happy to help, but I think you probably know much more about this car than I do. I suggest you go ahead, delete the rubbish, make the changes. Then, if you like, I can check the article for the Wiki-ish things like internal links. We could also request a "peer review" which is where we specifically announce that we'd like other people to come and check the article. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 15:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kiumars and everybody,

The changes I made:

Platform: Samand uses the 405 platform. The chassis, suspension, drivetrain,... are the same. Even the wheelbase and track are the same. Note that two cars may share the same platform and have different wheelbases, but if they have the same wheelbabses, they definately have the same platform. Some even go as far as calling the Samand a facelift, which is not too off. I was one of them actualy, but after talking with some IKCO guys, I have accepted it is the same platform ;), but without almost any changes to the platform itself. A lot of cars share platforms. For example the European Ford Focus, the Mazda3, Volvo S40,... use the same platform. So do the 307 and Citroen C4. The next generation Samand will use the 307 platform.

Collaboration started with the 504: I don't have a clue. Actualy, I feel it isn't correct. But what I changed was to emphasize that the 504 drivetrain, and not just the engine, was used only in some Peykan models. I remember hearing the entire story once, but don't remember what it was :)

Also, on the CdA (drag coefficient x area) discussed here, I know for sure (straight from the horse's mouth) that the Pars and Samand have worse values. That said, even in a single model, it is usual to have a 0.02 difference between trim levels, as thing like tires and skirts affect it quite a bit. This is why the top speed of the Pars is less than the 405, whatever IKCO writes in their site. Their site is not very reliable. My memory is a bit rusty, but I think Samand had a better Cd than Pars, about the same as the 405, but more area. Not sure on this one though.

I should also mention that Peugeot is the brand. PSA is the company (PSA Peugeot Citroen). I was too lazy to clean up that.

Ahmad 22:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad, should I remind you that Wiki is an encyclopedia and statements like “I had it from the horses mouth” and “I remember hearing the entire story once, but don't remember what it was” and “My memory is a bit rusty”, etc have no place in here. If you write something here it must be supported by technical documents and specification comparisons, etc. I rather no to read anything at all than reading something wrong! Don’t you? Kiumars 15:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kiumars, that's why I should remind you that didn't place the changes in the article. The only changes I made to the article where the ones which I was sure about, and could support it. Or it was some grammatical changes to previous stuff, to make my sentences fit in. Ahmad

Sooren not Soran[edit]

--Sina Rahmani 19:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Please change "Soran" to "Sooren" your spelling is not correct. This name comes from Sooren Pahlav which is Rostam in Shahnameh.[reply]

Diesel version[edit]

Is there a diesel version of any of these cars? Towel401 (talk) 09:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Export[edit]

The car is already being sold in Turkey...The Honorable Kermanshahi (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=35274&NewsKind=Current%20Affairs
    Triggered by \biranmania\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.iranmania.com/News/Photoes/General/Top/330samand.jpg
    Triggered by \biranmania\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on IKCO Samand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on IKCO Samand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on IKCO Samand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IKCO Samand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:IKCO_Samand&oldid=1202910506"