This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
"What is on [my] mind?"
Well, I've been going hog wild marking up the article (rather than just editing this talk page) with what are in both the literal and the WP-markup senses comments about the (same accompanying) article. I did so bcz the substantive issues I raised about its content are provocative, to a degree that makes prior discussion IMO unusually important, in the hope that this turns out to be neither a fight nor me making a colleague feel offended and go away angry. And who checks the talk page when the article has not been edited? Well,I edited the accompanying article w/o significantly changing how it's rendered, since I'm indisposed from quickly tracing the attribution of the parts I find problematic.
I'll try to get to better editing facilities than I currently have at home, and inspect the edit history to see if the rewrites I've advocated in the form of comments, visible only while (at least) preparing to edit, at the points where they'd affect how the article would render.
OK, I gotta save and go out for now, and think later abt whether there's something I'm forgetting to mention in a timely fashion. --Jerzy•t 17:25, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
