Talk:Innichen
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 13 August 2016[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Let the user who attempted a copy-paste know that there wasn't consensus. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 06:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Innichen → San Candido – The English name has changed to San Candido, see here:http://www.three-peaks.info/en/san-candido.html Sro23 (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. The current article title Innichen is perfectly in line with our policies, namely WP:NBZ: [...] articles about locations in South Tyrol are placed according to the language of the linguistic majority. In any case, the ngram viewer suggests a clear prevalence of Innichen in English books, too... --Mai-Sachme (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. User:Mai-Sachme's ngrams shows an increase in usage of Innichen in English print sources. Also note the titles of other South Tyrolean places. — AjaxSmack 21:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think were allowed to withdraw requested moves, but I just want to say I agree with what everyone opposing has been saying, they make good points. To be honest, the main reason why I requested a move is a user tried to do a cut-and-paste, which I undid, but then they asked me nicely to move the articles, and I felt bad. Sro23 (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.