Talk:Integrated standby instrument system

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Integrated standby instrument system article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

I am a pilot[edit]

I can tell you for a fact that this has more than that it also includes artificial horizon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothy Robinson12345 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent -- I didn't see this in any reference when I created the article. Can you please add that to the article with a reference?--NapoliRoma (talk) 14:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content. It describes a standard piece of aircraft equipment, and explains why it exists and how it is integrated as a component of an aircraft glass cockpit. Specific to A3, it gives useful information that cannot be derived from the title of the article, nor do any of the other criteria apply. It's linked from several articles that benefit from having additional context for the equipment mentioned. --NapoliRoma (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the CSD tag because the article contains enough sufficient content. It does not belong in the category Timothy had tagged it. It may fall under another tag, I don't know. I haven't actually read the article. But it does not fall under "No content whatsoever". Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 15:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]