Talk:JAD (software)

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Noteworthiness[edit]

What's it going to take to prove that the standard java decompiler is "noteworthy"? It's certainly more noteworthy than 98% of the stuff on wikipedia. Go check any major java site (IBM developer works, Sun, online sites, whatever) and you'll see it referenced time and time again. 76.68.27.113 (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JAD a simple tool used in a limited number of circumstances, and never independently of some larger toolset. It's not worthy of its own entry. Also, Wikipedia requires reputable third party sources for information on a topic. I can't find such a source to explain what JAD is, where it comes from, what situations its used in, what is its relevance, etc. Not every program gets its own page on Wikipedia. Because of these things, I've nominated the article for deletion. Lousyd (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Down[edit]

Website is down. Is it dead? --206.72.77.76 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon?[edit]

A vida me pregou mais uma peça por essa não pude esperar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.48.112.24 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JAD or Jad?[edit]

It is JAD or Jad? Currently this article uses both. --Mortense (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Author only called it "Jad" so I think it's reasonable to rename this article. --Franklin Yu (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Java not JAva[edit]

The title of the article is capitalized incorrectly. Is there any way to change that? Inside the article it is written as Java. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbyqwerty12 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's titled correctly. The 'A' is capitalized to emphasis that it is part of the acronym of 'JAD'. Rurik (talk) 20:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]