Talk:John Jacobs (evangelist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Why is a random sentence not in context with the rest of the article included about him divorcing his wife? I could see if it mentioned he married her, explained their life together, and then mentioned they divorced. But it seems very biased that a comment such as that on a Christian-related article makes mention of it without any explanation or substance. Very weak remark to include in the article. 69.129.170.102 (talk) 22:26, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since providing marriage and divorce info is of encyclopedic interest for every other notable person, I'd actually say removing mention of divorce on a Christian-related article would appear biased. I've added family details to the infobox, which is more understated than including it in the main article. Subvisser5 (talk) 03:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Jacobs (evangelist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]