Talk:John Tewkesbury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Tewkesbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

This article needs a deal of rephrasing to get NPOV.

Parts seem to be written from a combatatively pro-Protestant/anti-Catholic: it reads like quotations of John Foxxe, who is reliable when re-printing documents but not reliable when passing on gossip and oral tradition: when Foxe is used it should be prefaced to warn users that Foxe is reporting or is passing on what people alleged, not what is necessarily true. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muddled[edit]

The account is very muddled. How is it possible that Tewkesbury was arrested and tried by the predecessor of the bishop who examined Constantine to get the information that then caused the warrant for Tewkesbury's arrest? Time travel?

Were there, perhaps, two incidents: a first arrest with the stick as the punishment (which happened for minor heresy or abjuration), then a second arrest with dire results (as a relapsed or obstinate heretic)? Rick Jelliffe (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have slightly unmuddled it, mainly by better headings. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]