Talk:Joint Combat Pistol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HK45[edit]

A contender for the trials is the HK45. The USP45 has been in existence for some time, and it does not meet the requirements set forth by the competition. A picture of the new HK45 can be found here. Haizum 10:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is a fine looking pistol! Ve3 00:14, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GLOCK 21[edit]

The GLOCK 21 is a fine pistol, but doesn't meet the requirements for the JCP Programme. The specification states that "The JCP shall be capable of being produced either with or without an external manual safety (3.4.6.3)." GLOCK pistols have no external safety, nor are they designed to be produced with one. Any GLOCK entry into the competition would have to be a new production item. Magnum Augustus 20:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

European GLOCKs with safety[edit]

Can someone confirm that GLOCK does offer its pistols with an external safety to Europeans? --HashiriyaGDB 02:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermarket kits are also available. Haizum 22:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joint Combat Pistol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]