Talk:Joseph Strickland

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Catholicism Low‑importance

Joseph Strickland is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Why?[edit]

The article currently has "In 2021, Pope Francis imposed restrictions on the celebration of the Tridentine Mass." Why is this relevant in the section about Strickland's view? Ordinarius Beau 15:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with your concerns about relevancy; I have removed that portion. Maximilian775 (talk) 20:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why would "Emeritus" be used?[edit]

Clearly the term "Emeritus" is a meritorious title associated with one's former position in an organization while still honorably associated with that specific organization. Strickland is still a Bishop of the Church. Yet, there is no indication from the Diocese of Taylor that he is still honorably associated with it. Quite to the contrary, he was relieved of (fired from) his position. There was nothing honorable about it. He is simply a former Bishop of Taylor TX. SoGr82CU2 (talk) 05:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We can use "emeritus", if RS use that word. For the time being, I removed it. Other living former office holders (e.g. Barack Obama) simply have their former office stated. Rsk6400 (talk) 07:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obama is not really comparable as "emeritus" is not a term used in reference to Presidents, who after all only hold office for a limited number of years. Obama wasn't "emerited" - his term just expired. A bishopric however is, in principle, given with no limit.

OTOH, Strickland was removed from office by "adminsitrative order", not deposed as the result of a legal trial. Given that there is no verdict, he should be treated like any other bishop. Str1977 ^(talk) 06:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the text above the picture be updated in light of recent events?[edit]

Shouldn't the text above the picture be updated in light of recent events?

It reads "His Excellency, The Most Reverend Bishop of Tyler".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:200:c082:2ea0:8141:b83f:2825:cbdc (talk • contribs) 02:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Term ended" makes it clear enough. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's always a good idea to follow an untrue designation with the truth.

But it's much better to avoid the untrue designation to begin with.

NOTE: There seems to be some stray letters and a square bracket atop the photo.

Motto[edit]

Hi, Can someone check the Latin on his crest? I used Google to translate the Latin motto "Ut inhabitem in domo Domini" and it was translated as "That they should NOT dwell in the house of the Lord" (note the NOT).

When I back translated with Google from "That they should dwell in the house of the Lord" (with NOT removed), I get "ut inhabitent in domo Domini".

So which is correct here? inhabitem Vs inhabitent

Thanks Jaqian (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sajor, the Wikipedian who did this coat of arms and does many others, is very competent -- I can't imagine him making a mistake. I also have some experience with Latin, and the phrase appears correct. It's more likely that Google Translate incorrectly did the translation, which is common.

Maximilian775 (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]