Talk:Kingston Flyer

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in New Zealand Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	June 12, 2011

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Zealand Railways.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Merge in Kingston Flyer (train)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Time to close this. Merged as per consensus below. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These two articles discuss each other as they seem to be essentially the same train running in different era's. The more modern is named after the older. I propose merging them together. Jeepday (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's a service that essentially evolved into a tourist service. There does not need to be two separate confusingly named pages about this. Ka ro ra 11:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.