Talk:Koseze Pond

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Pond/lake[edit]

The majority of sources describe the entity as a lake (jezero; e.g. [1], [2][3]), so I've modified the description accordingly. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 08:53, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At 3.8 ha it's probably better characterized as a pond in English (although lake is also acceptable) based on these criteria; but there is a lot of variation in the definitions. In any case, I'd also refer to Koseze Pond (Koseški bajer) and Lake Koseze (Koseško jezero), as currently in the article, to maintain the semantic equivalence of the names. Doremo (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand completely. Do you therefore suggest it would be better to use the term pond for this body of water? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 19:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article title should definitely stay at "Koseze Pond" to match the semantics of the most common name, Koseški bajer. However, for the generic description in the running text of the article either "(large) pond" or "small lake" would be acceptable, based on these criteria. But the Slovene description as jezero is largely irrelevant for deciding how to refer to it generically in English because the semantics of jezero don't fully correspond to the semantics of lake. Given the article title with Pond, it's probably best to refer to it as a "pond" in the running text too simply for consistency. Doremo (talk) 04:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 13:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]