Talk:Krishnamurti foundations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merge with Jiddu Krishnamurti Schools[edit]

Same topic Rathfelder (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 January 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Krishnamurti FoundationKrishnamurti foundations – Reading this article and the article The First and Last Freedom, it appears that there is not one Krishnamurti Foundation, but several different foundations, which have different names and operate in different areas. An IP editor of The First and Last Freedom specifically objects to linking to this article as if there's a singular foundation. -- Beland (talk) 20:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support – In the interest of disclosure this is the above-mentioned IP editor. It seems a large part of the article has been written from the perspective of a specific foundation, the Krishnamurti Foundation India (KFI). This is apart from the fact that the article has serious other issues. As a first step, it is important to be categorized properly. The foundations have nothing to do with "Indian philosophy", "New religious movements", and they are expressly not "spiritual" institutions or organizations. 65.88.88.59 (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this is going ahead of the issue, but I wonder about the scope of the article. There are many Krishnamurti-related organizations, both official and unofficial. He was definitely associated with the four official foundations and most of the schools they operated. There were also so-called Krishnamurti committees that he allowed to use his name and a few independent (non-Foundation) schools he considered similarly (if only temporarily). He was very careful with who was representing him, and how. Should the article concentrate on the so-called "official" or sanctioned-by-him organizations? 67.243.247.14 (talk) 15:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.