Talk:Lao royal family

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Southeast Asia: Laos

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Laos.

Title change[edit]

Title needs to be changed to Lao Royal Family.Inthavbo (talk) 05:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yes, "Laotian" is not as appropriate as "Lao", and this is the most common name. Night w (talk) 06:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge articles?[edit]

New to the process, but a quick observation shows that there is similar information at the Royal Lao Government page. Should these two articles be combined? Cam Vilay (talk) 06:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, they should be separate. One was a legitimate government whereas this entry appears to be a self promotion by a group claiming legitimacy to the throne (which is contested). Mell.ning (talk) 01:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Biased[edit]

This article is biased and requires extensive historical research and citations, there are inadequate references as to the legitimacy of the information and it appears to come from a non-credible source rather then a site run by unknown. (Mell.ning (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]