This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Come on, how can we be sure this list is complete? And especially that it stays complete? --Thnidu (talk) 03:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Thnidu (talk) 03:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The red links in this list (which I have not edited) were without references nor links to other language wikipedia entries, so a major clean-up was unavoidable. However, suggesting that the sufficient condition listed at WP:CSC of " Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own non-redirect article in the English Wikipedia. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the listed group, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future." means that "Every entry should have its own non-redirect article in English Wikipedia to prove it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria." is fundamentally wrong. Afasmit (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:LISTPURP seems to be to organize articles (also WP:CLNT), i.e its own non-redirect articles. Unverified red links are against policy and a large number of verified red links are discouraged therefore every entree should have its own non-redirect article in English Wikipedia to prove it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria - it is also this list WP:LISTCRITERIA. There is nothing "fundamentally wrong" there. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]